[svlug] Explaining the Election

[Mark Weisler]

On Friday 25 January 2008 13:57:14 Paul Reiber wrote:
> Rick, you've conveniently side-swiped my entire argument; that the
> appointments I made stand, and that those offices are NOT CURRENTLY
> VACANT, unless indeed both parties have since resigned.
>
> If that's indeed true, that they've since resigned, then yes, there
> are no officers, and we need elections ASAP for those roles.  Mark did
> not clarify this; he stated that the offices are currently empty,
> which, AFAIK, is not the case.
I did not say that the offices are currently empty. Nor did I say the offices 
are filled. 

The people you say you appointed to office were part of the discussion and 
agreement that an election should be held.


>
> While Ed has publically stated that he's not accepting the
> appointment, Lisa hasn't.  So, we probably still currently have a VP,
> at a minimum.
>
> The current state of the offices is unclear at best; to state that
> they're vacant does a disservice to the membership, since indeed, like
> it or not, I did what I did, and appointed two successors to those
> offices.
Volunteers are helping and we can get by just fine until the election, and 
afterward.

>
> Best regards,
> -Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> svlug mailing list
> svlug at lists.svlug.org
> http://lists.svlug.org/lists/listinfo/svlug



-- 
Mark Weisler 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.svlug.org/archives/svlug/attachments/20080125/5f313995/attachment.bin