[volunteers] Election deferred

[Luke S Crawford]

Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com> writes:

> Elections were not held for SVLUG president and VP at the December
> meeting because no candidates were present.  Interested parties?


Do we still have nobody?  

So I've been asking around about this, and apparently it's not just me;
we have quite the repuation.  It's sad, really, as considering our
location, this should be /the/ linux user group.  

So I was thinking of how maybe we could improve our repuation,
and I have the start of an idea:

We (meaning the SVLUG membership) should expect the president to
keep order during the meetings, and expect the president (or some 
other sanctioned offer)  to ask a disruptive member to step outside
and talk (or perhaps ask the disruptive member to leave?) 

What are other thoughts on the matter?   Is it really as big of
a problem as people say?  Is this the best way to address the problem?