[volunteers] [Mailman-owner] Request to mailing list Jobs rejected
ajitk at email.com
Fri Nov 13 12:01:38 PST 2009
Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Ajit Natarajan (ajitk at email.com):
>> Third strike, I guess. I think it is best that I not forward anymore
>> job ads to the LUG. It is simply too much work.
> Your call. I personally don't think bothering to include the city, and
> omitting jobs that are _very obviously_ outside the Bay Area, is "work" at
> all, but, hey, it's your time to spend as you please. I'm just one of
> the poor sods who apply the (very few, very simple) rules as posted.
> Writing carefully written, polite reject messages is a considerable
> drain on _my_ time, by the way, and I've really not appreciated having
> to do so in your case _over and over again_. So, your ceasing to ignore
> SVLUG's mailing lists rules in any fashion you choose, certainly
> including refraining from posting, would actually be keenly appreciated.
I understand. I was looking at it solely from the perspective of those
who may be unemployed and are looking for jobs in this tough economy. I
am simply forwarding what I think are relevant postings. I am not
creating these postings. So, trying to find out the specifics of the
job just so that every ``t'' is crossed would be extra work. IMO, if a
person is interested, they will follow up with the contact. If the
person doesn't want to do that, they can ignore the post. (That is what
I would do if I am unemployed and looking for a job.)
But it does not seem like it will work with this LUG. So, it is best
for me to refrain from posting.
Rick, I understand that you are enforcing policy set by someone else.
Perhaps whoever set this policy can chime in.
More information about the volunteers