[Volunteers] [Fwd: Re: [2e764@mikesoffice.org: Re: [Lug-nuts] Meetings, Other Lugs]]

Chris Verges chverges at cisco.com
Mon Aug 1 06:40:41 PDT 2005


Seems like both Bill and I fall victim to the "Reply" button.  :-)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [Volunteers] [2e764 at mikesoffice.org: Re: [Lug-nuts] 
Meetings, Other Lugs]
Date: 	Mon, 01 Aug 2005 06:38:11 -0700
From: 	Chris Verges <chverges at cisco.com>
To: 	Bill Kendrick <nbs at sonic.net>
References: 	<20050731230429.GD14927 at sonic.net> 
<42ED7829.5030702 at cisco.com> <20050801031238.GD17978 at thunder.sbay.org> 
<42ED97CE.6040008 at cisco.com> <20050801054158.GG13827 at sonic.net>



Bill Kendrick wrote:

>Hehe, one of the problems with doing a survey of people at the _meeting_ is those are the people who already come to meetings, and have very little use for it. ;^)
>
Not necessarily, though I do understand the stupidity in what I said 
before I even said it.  Those people can't ALWAYS make the meetings, so 
they would be able to answer it from the perspective of a member who 
routinely comes but sometimes cannot.  :-)

Besides, the SVLUG is a group for the members, by the members, right?  
Let them make the decision on whether we should be looking into it.  :-)

Thanks,

Chris Verges
-- 
chverges at cisco.com
408 525-0401




Chris Verges
-- 
chverges at cisco.com
408 525-0401




More information about the volunteers mailing list