[Volunteers] Undisclosed banned discussion topics (was: yum extender)
William R Ward
bill at svlug.org
Thu Jul 14 17:36:53 PDT 2005
Rick Moen writes:
>Quoting William R Ward (bill at svlug.org):
>
>> In other words, there is a difference of opinion between Paul and Rick
>> about what the word "officer" means... Paul, what do you call people
>> like Rick who perform a specific task for SVLUG (i.e. webmastering)
>> but are not officers?
>
>Certainly, Paul is empowered to redefine the terms SVLUG uses and discard
>(if he wishes) our old meanings of same. I just wanted to point out
>that you two guys _have_ in fact redefined this one -- without
>discussion or consultation of anyone else. (Not that change isn't often
>good, but I'll mention again that it's part of the pattern of you two
>having lunch and then rearranging things without consulting or informing
>anyone else, like the night in late March when I suddenly discovered
>that my web-team mailing listadmin password didn't work, that the list
>seemed to be suddenly missing, and I had to figure out why, for myself.)
I would like to be clear on one thing: It isn't "you two guys" who has
redefined anything. Paul is the President; he makes the decisions.
He includes me in certain discussions, but the final decision is his.
>> I think the structure should extend to recognizing the contributions
>> of those whom Rick is calling "appointed officers" in some way.
>
>Whom _I'm_ calling that?
>
>Um, Bill? If you for some reason are choosing to disbelieve me, that
>SVLUG has had appointive officers for a dog's age, then you need only
>ask Don Marti. Or Marc Merlin. Or Ben Spade. Or Rob Walker. Or Dan
>Kionka.
In the message YOU wrote, YOU used that term. That's all I meant.
The context is a difference of opinion between YOU and Paul as to the
meaning of the term "officer."
>> Quaere: How does the sbay.org constitution address the issue of SIG's
>> having appointed officers?
>
>Um, Bill? As I've mentioned to you before, a key precondition of SVLUG
>affiliating with sbay.org was that sbay was not to intrude on SVLUG's
>internal affairs. No matter who (I notice) suddenly turns out to own
>our domain name.
Paul mentioned sbay.org and I was asking for more information on that
point.
--Bill.
--
William R. Ward - Vice President, Silicon Valley Linux Users Group
bill at svlug.org - http://www.svlug.org - (650) 279-9904
More information about the volunteers
mailing list