[Volunteers] "*** of the Month"
ikluft at thunder.sbay.org
Tue Jul 5 15:09:06 PDT 2005
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 01:18:05PM -0700, J. Paul Reed wrote:
> On 05 Jul 2005 at 13:06:04, William R Ward arranged the bits on my disk to say:
> > I'd like to suggest we not use the term "Foo of the month." The term
> > "foo" is derived from an acronym that uses foul language, is alien to the
> > newbie, and is cliche to the experienced user. Let's just call it "tool
> > of the month" or something similar.
> I'm going to ask for other opinions on this; I understand that it's derived
> from a military term which is a... colorful acronym.
> On the other hand, I really like the ambiguity "Foo of the month" allows
> us, and the fact of the matter is that foo, bar, baz, etc. are all terms
> that are used within the open source community quite frequently, and
> without any reference to the original acronym.
> In some sense, we've made it ours.
> I also think it's cute; "'Tool' of the Month" is boring; how many LUGs have
> done *that*?
I can understand Bill's concern about the origin of the term. But I think
that's digging too deep into its history for current relevance.
My opinion: "foo" has moved decades beyond its WWII origin. Today it means
a sample/placeholder word you can fill in anywhere.
I found supporting references...
ESR's Jargon File
RFC 3092: Etymology of "Foo" (see posting date - not on standards track)
If "foo" is not selected in the discussion, the Wikipedia article lists
other "Metasyntactic Variables" like it. But "foo" is considered the first
More information about the volunteers