[svlug] ISSUE: SVLUG's continued status with SBAY

[Robert Hajime Lanning]

<quote who="Rick Moen">
> And meanwhile, we're being urged by several people to adopt a
> solution (a "SIG charter") that _ignores the problem_:  The
> basic problem is that SBAY SIG status really doesn't benefit
> SVLUG at all.  There's nothing we have within that relationship
> that we cannot have equally well without being a property of
> that corporation.
>
> A "SIG charter" would do nothing to fix that.  So, it's completely
> irrelevant to the issue at hand.

Actually the question is:
 1) Do we want to piggyback on the work that SBAY is doing to be
    a running legal corporation for whatever benifits a corporation
    status gives us?
 2) Do we want to split and do all the incorporation work ourselves?
or
 3) Do we want to split and just be a group with a mailing list (no
    incorporation?)

If your answer is that there is no benifit for number 1, that would
mean that there is no benifit for number 2.  Hence, number 3 is the
only way to go.

Then also my question is, if we create a "SIG Charter", what harm is
there in being part of SBAY?

-- 
And, did Guloka think the Ulus were too ugly to save?
                                         -Centauri