[svlug] ISSUE: SVLUG's continued status with SBAY
Robert Hajime Lanning
lanning at lanning.cc
Wed Feb 22 02:14:05 PST 2006
<quote who="Rick Moen">
> And meanwhile, we're being urged by several people to adopt a
> solution (a "SIG charter") that _ignores the problem_: The
> basic problem is that SBAY SIG status really doesn't benefit
> SVLUG at all. There's nothing we have within that relationship
> that we cannot have equally well without being a property of
> that corporation.
> A "SIG charter" would do nothing to fix that. So, it's completely
> irrelevant to the issue at hand.
Actually the question is:
1) Do we want to piggyback on the work that SBAY is doing to be
a running legal corporation for whatever benifits a corporation
status gives us?
2) Do we want to split and do all the incorporation work ourselves?
3) Do we want to split and just be a group with a mailing list (no
If your answer is that there is no benifit for number 1, that would
mean that there is no benifit for number 2. Hence, number 3 is the
only way to go.
Then also my question is, if we create a "SIG Charter", what harm is
there in being part of SBAY?
And, did Guloka think the Ulus were too ugly to save?
More information about the svlug