[svlug] RH dependencies, not using up2date
Karsten M. Self
kmself at ix.netcom.com
Fri Jul 26 03:04:15 PDT 2002
Please don't cc me on list mail.
on Fri, Jul 26, 2002, Rafael Skodlar,,, (raffi at linwin.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 12:27:25AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > on Thu, Jul 25, 2002, Rafael Skodlar,,, (raffi at linwin.com) wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 02:11:51PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> > > For that reason I decided to give Debian another try. I too want to be
> > > a "lazy sysadmin" and use one line commands to install software.
> > > Debian failed to work on my hardware earlier where RH and Mandrake
> > > would install without major problems. Now that Debian 3.0 is out I
> > > started to convert some critical systems to Debian. I have routers,
> > > NFS servers etc. running on Debian just fine. Initial install takes
> > > less than 100MB of disk space which speaks for itself.
> > 100 MiB? My initial install takes ~51 mIb -- untarring the
> > base2_2.tgz image *is* a working Debian system.
> My claim of "less than 100MB" is not necessarily 100% over your claim.
> It was a simple guess not remembering exact numbers.
Don't take that too much to heart. It's rare that I install into less
than ~200-250 MiB, and for a full-featured system, /usr tends to run
around 3 GiB (1.7 of which are currently used on this laptop). But yes,
you can get a small system going. For a really pared down system, one
of the bootdisk utilities is recommended, as package management
(including list and deb storage) is significant overhead.
> > > In order to learn more about Debian I subscribed to 6 Debian
> > > lists. Due to high level of spam on their mailing lists I dropped
> > > 3 right away. Mention that on one of their lists and you'll draw
> > > flames and useless "filter solution" suggestions from "Debian
> > > bigots".
> > Which lists?
> > Those filter solutions -- particularly if they refer to
> > spamassassin, are hardly useless. This catches 95%+ of my daily
> > spam, and passes 99.98% of the legitimate mail I get. I'd
> > reevaluate your response.
> Any filtering is "after the fact"!!! I don't want the smelly camel
> nose under my tent.
This too depends. Depending on your mail feed, there are various
reject-on-SMPT-connect options. I'm happy automatically filtering my
spam and automatically sending most of it to Marc ;-)
> > Google groups doesn't show any of your posts (matching on 'rafael'
> > and/or 'skodlar') in muc.lists.debian.*
> It was under debian-security if I remember correctly.
OK. Just checking.
> > > My impression was that they are nontolerant elitist group that doesn't
> > > want around anybody that's not religious fanatic like them. To me the
> > > OS is only a tool to do my work more efficiently and debian seem to
> > > fit that description.
> > Yadda, yadda. All stripes, Raffie, all stripes. Deal with it. And
> > don't tell me you haven't heard of Snobbian.
> Well it was a bit weird when they told me to "go back to Redhat".
I'll have to dig up that exchange. I mean, it's not as if we've ever
had spats here....
> > Debian _does_ differ from most mainstream GNU/Linux distros in that
> > philosophy matters (Social Contract, FSD, Debian Policy), to very
> > good effect, I might add. The only comperable distribution of any
> > sort I know is OpenBSD (goal, philosophy, and licensing guidelines),
> > and, well, Theo's just _so_ much warmer and fuzzier than your
> > typical Dweebian....
> That's all fine. I don't want to talk them down on this list since they
> do Lords work ;-)
> > Debian's a way solid distro, the list support is among the best I've
> > seen bar any mode for any software.
> I'm not arguing that. It's just that their mailing lists are open to
> relaying spam. I can't remember when we received last spam on this
SVLUG's closed to nonsubscribers, most of the Debian lists are open.
There *is* filtering on the Debian lists (possibly varying coverage by
list, it's been implemented over the past 6-9 months). This is to allow
people to post to the list even if they're not subscribed -- it's a
trade-off. You're not seeing relays per se, just abuse of list mail. A
spammer can't mail to arbitrary destinations, only to a list's
subscribers. It's a hassle of the 'Net, I maintain a few lists, and
even the ones that *do* see traffic (there are a couple of mostly dead
projects I'm still sitting on) see a significant amount of spam -- which
yours truly, list admin, gets to reject it.
Karsten M. Self <kmself at ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
Übersoft: If We're Not Rich, You're Not Gullible.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.svlug.org/archives/svlug/attachments/20020726/53e471f8/attachment.bin
More information about the svlug