[svlug] Bind Vulnerabilities

[Rick Moen]

begin Dagmar d'Surreal quotation:

> Saints preserve me for somehow winding up in the curious position of
> _defending_ DJB, but he _has_ mentioned that his implementation is
> targeted at replacing caching-only daemons and single standalone
> daemons that serve only a few zones (which covers at least half of the
> nameservers out there, so I'd say it's a valid niche).

Please note that I specifically said that as a _general_ alternative
to BIND, it isn't there.

And, I'm sorry, I don't consider omitting IETF Notify and IXFR, just
because the author doesn't like them, to be acceptable.  Especially
Notify, for heaven's sake.  Hasn't the man ever heard of secondaries?

-- 
Cheers,                                      Right to keep and bear
Rick Moen                                  Haiku shall not be abridged
rick at linuxmafia.com                           Or denied.  So there.