[svlug] Convincing Rationale URL for Old Man to Shorten Email Line Length?
claw@kanga.nu
claw at kanga.nu
Tue Jun 5 13:37:02 PDT 2001
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:40:51 -0700
Karsten M Self <kmself at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> on Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:59:52PM -0700, J C Lawrence
> (claw at kanga.nu) wrote:
>> Pet peeve: I do wish people wouldn't insert space characters in
>> quote strings. It wasts space, is no more readable, encourages
>> bad line folding, and tends to break software that handles quote
>> reformatting.
Correction: I'm complaining of intra-quote character space.
> Space is there to be wasted (spoken as one who's just driven
> through some 2200 miles of it, and then some).
Aye, I've driven the coast-to-coast trip as well (tho that's a bit
more than 2.2K).
> I disagree with you on virtually all points: I don't see the space
> as wasted, it makes identifying nesting levels more, not less,
Disagreed. I find it visually easier to distinguish between the
following two quote levels:
>> This is some older quoted text
>> This is some older quoted text
>> This is some older quoted text
> This is some newer quoted text.
> This is some newer quoted text.
> This is some newer quoted text.
And this more difficult to visually distinguish between levels:
> > This is some older quoted text
> > This is some older quoted text
> > This is some older quoted text
> This is some newer quoted text.
> This is some newer quoted text.
> This is some newer quoted text.
My eyes tend to see the " >" (note leading space) as a potential
letter/word rather than as an indentation token.
> Plus you only need one rule for quoting content: take the current
> line and preface it with '> '.
Accepted, tho I would also expect any reasonable tool to reflow the
text to fiti reasonable margins.
> Your style needs two rules. Not a major deal breaker, but a bit
> of additional complexity, and believe you me, 95% of email client
> authors will break it somehow.
True. I've got a elisp chunk that sits in front of one of my
mailing lists that tries to munge posts to a more acceptable format
(s/> >/>>/ is one of the operations as is s/^>* *$//). It has
received several compliments on improving the readability of the
list (and one complaint that it redented one fellow's itemised
list).
--
J C Lawrence claw at kanga.nu
---------(*) http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/
The pressure to survive and rhetoric may make strange bedfellows
More information about the svlug
mailing list