[svlug] Virus FUD
Richard_Jennings at sandia.gov
Fri May 5 17:31:55 PDT 2000
Here's an article on current email vulnerablities:
At 5:03 PM -0700 5/5/00, Kenneth Kellum wrote:
>Question. The LOVEBUG worm exploited the ability of a malicious Visual Basic
>program to damage a system.
>If a similar worm was written to attack a Linux system, could a malicious Perl
>(say) program do the same damage to that system?
>I suspect the answer is "no", but I'd like to hear from more knowledgable
>On Fri, 05 May 2000, Richard Jennings wrote:
>> I emailed someone in our corporate headquarters the suggestion that maybe
>> it's time to look at something other than Outlook as a corporate standard.
>> Here was his reply:
>> >Maybe. Maybe not. 2-3 of the natl and intl stories I read on it this
>> >make the point that Outlook was apparently targeted primarily because it's
>> >widely used. If we and most other orgs move to X, then hackers will target
>> >X. there's nothing inherent in Outlook that makes it more vulnerable than
>> >other systems, they point out.
>> I think I'll spend part of the weekend gathering some data to send his
>> way.:) Any pointers appreciated.
>> Richard Jennings
>> Sandia National Labs
>> 7011 East Ave.
>> PO Box 969 MailStop 9055
>> Livermore, CA 94551
>> ph 925-294-2696
>> Fax 925-294-2550
>> Richard_Jennings at sandia.gov
>> svlug mailing list
>> svlug at lists.svlug.org
>Kenneth R. Kellum -- San Jose State University
>Work like you don't need money,
>Love like you've never been hurt, and
>Dance like no one is watching.
More information about the svlug