switch to mailman (was: [svlug] Re: [svlug]syslogd question)
marc_news at valinux.com
Mon May 1 19:34:34 PDT 2000
On lun, mai 01, 2000 at 07:07:05 -0700, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> It strikes me that changing the method of subscribing is going to be
> somewhat disruptive of the habits people have about mailing lists. I don't
> just mean svlug. Until the last few months, when someone told me about a new
> list, I'd assumed I could join it (if it is a public list) by sending the
> usual message to majordomo at someplace_or_other.com . Mailman's
Yeah. Just like one would only write a document with word :-)
The reason why we got rid of majordomo is that it blew chunks, and the
chunks were so big that they were starting to damage the server room floor
> [listname]-requests may well be an improvement, but what it obviously is is
> different, and in this context, that feels like not a good thing.
More seriously, listname-request was there way before majordomo even
existed, it's a listserv standard.
Many mailing lists don't run on majordomo....
> Do you know if anyone has thought of ... or even done ... a
> "majordomo-compatibility" add-on that processes requests sent the "old" way?
listname-request is the old way, as in listserv was there before majordomo.
> Or even if the internal logic of mailman would permit that? Something like
You can write a perl/shell/python script that would behave as majordomo and
translate the input and feed it mailman.
Apparently no one has found it useful to do that.
Microsoft is to software what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ (friendly to non IE browsers)
Finger marc_f at merlins.org for PGP key and other contact information
More information about the svlug