[svlug] libc questions
Michael K Vance
mkv102 at psu.edu
Sun Nov 22 06:47:28 PST 1998
Rick Moen wrote:
> 1. Which C compiler and version are you using to do this?
gcc 2.8.1 (yes, I'm aware they recommend egcs 1.0.3 or 1.1--working on it).
> 2. The version you're attempting to compile is a pre-2.0.7 _alpha_.
> Considered something more stable?
Are you saying that 2.0.103 has been released before the famed 2.0.7pre6? It
seems to me that is not the case--2.0.7 was released end of August, 2.0.103 is
the latest off of alpha.gnu.org, with a date of Nov. 21. If you're simply
referring to its incredible alpha-ness, yes, I'm aware of that.
> Any binaries compiled against libc.so.5 or similar will become un-runnable,
> if you do. However, why would you want to do that? It would seem an
Sure. It was a matter of system clutter, I guess--having old compatability
libraries laying around. Nothing more.
> The ldd command displays what library "sonames" a binary will invoke
> dynamically.
Sure, I just didn't want to ldd every executable to check, and was wondering
if there were any especially notorious ones.
Thanks,
m.
--
"Up above aliens hover making home movies for the folks back home, of all
these weird creatures who lock up their spirits, drill holes in themselves
and live for their secrets. They're all uptight." -Thom Yorke, Radiohead
--
echo "unsubscribe svlug" | mail majordomo at svlug.org
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ to unsubscribe
see http://www.svlug.org/mdstuff/lists.shtml for posting guidelines.
More information about the svlug
mailing list