[Smaug] Fedora 12 Beta now available
abcruzww at gmail.com
Thu Oct 29 15:27:44 PST 2009
Yes, as you and others have pointed out, stripping down what's
automatically installed by some distros is a good idea. Even better
would be a better control over installing the initial packages than
Ubuntu etc. provide. FreeBSD does a really good job of that, for
example - a minimal install can be done in a very few minutes, even
online, and then one can add packages at will .. building them or
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com> wrote:
> Quoting Peter Belew (abcruzww at gmail.com):
>> Good points - DSL and Puppy. I need to figure out UpStart and so on ...
> Just checking: I hope my point is not lost that you should -not- regard
> yourself as limited to the likes of Puppy Linux, DamnSmallLinux, and
> AntiX, for no better reason than having an older CPU and only (say)
> 128-256 MB -- or even 64 MB -- of total RAM.
> To the contrary, I was saying that this perception, that midget Linux
> distributions are the only way to go on older and lower-RAM boxen, is an
> unfortunate artifact of many Linux users' really, really bad assumption
> that they are "done" when the distro installer finishes -- that it's
> not useful and necessary to further tailor what _actually runs_ to meet
> the owner's needs.
> So, if one bothers to take charge of _runing what one wants_, instead of
> just leaving the default installation completely unchanged, exactly the
> way it shipped out the box, then one can use a broad range of real,
> non-midget Linux distributions. And those are (with all due respect to
> some excellent work on Puppy and kin) a great deal less limiting.
> Smaug mailing list
> Smaug at lists.svlug.org
> Smaug home page: http://www.scruz.org/
It's completely normal that you lose data on "Windows" platforms.
That's why you have a UNIX or Linux or BSD server for backups.
UBUNTU 9.10 29 Oct '09 http://www.ubuntu.com/
More information about the Smaug