[Smaug] scruz.org re-design

[Rick Moen]

Quoting cerise at armory.com (cerise at armory.com):

> I concur that in many ways it isn't really all that different....

Yes.  

> 1) Having a new site design that makes the group look...y'know...active....

This presupposes someone maintaining the site, a question that strikes 
me as entirely orthogonal to design.  

For some years, I've been asking for additional participation,
preferably from people who actually are in Santa Cruz, and have
carefully documented in public how the site works.  Nobody's raised 
a finger.  I've also done, I believe, 100% of the Mailman
administration.

I've in fact deliberately not busted my derriere updating the Web site for 
weekly meetings, specifically in hopes that someone would step up to
help.  And, well, no.

So, are you suggesting that someone's more likely to maintain Anthony's 
pages than David's?  Why?

> it seems obvious to me that the right choice is to hand it off to Anthony
> and let him own it while he's still motivated ; )

He's motivated?  Good.  I look forward to him joining the SourceForge 
project.